A- de 2016
The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.
Reporting justice Luis Ernesto Vargas Silva
✓Claimant Yeni Hurtado Velasquez
Topics and subtopics of the ruling
✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.
- Improcedencia por cuanto la solicitud se presentó después de realizado el reparto de los expedientes
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)
Solicitud de acumulación de procesos.
Teniendo en cuenta que la petición de acumulación se presentó luego de haberse realizado el reparto de los expedientes, considera la Corte que no es procedente despacharla favorablemente.
DENEGADA.
What it decided
Operative part (Resuelve)
✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.
- Primero. Negar, por las razones precedentes, la solicitud formulada por la ciudadana Yeni Hurtado Velasco.
- Segundo. Anexar al expediente D-11494 copia de este auto, para los efectos pertinentes.
- Tercero. Contra esta providencia no procede recurso alguno, de conformidad con lo dispuesto en el articulo 47 del Acuerdo 05 de 1992.
The bench that decided
We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.
How it connects
Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.
The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.